3-Berger, Peter.L (1977). “Secular Theology and the Rejection of the Supernatural: Reflections on Recent Trends.Rutgers University.Theology Study (38);39-56.
4-Heyer, K. (2004). How does theology go public? Rethinking the debate between David Tracy and George Lindbeck. Political Theology, 5(3), 307-327
5-Higton, M. (1997). Frei's Christology and Lindbeck's cultural-linguistic theory. Scottish Journal of Theology, 50(1), 83-96.
6.Jeanrond, W. G. (1993). Theology in the Context of Pluralism and Postmodernity: David Tracy’s Theological Method. In Postmodernism, Literature and the Future of Theology (pp. 143-163). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
7-Lindbeck, G. A. (1984). The nature of doctrine: Religion and theology in a postliberal age. Westminster John Knox Press.
8-Lints, R. (1993). The Postpositivist Choice: Tracy or Lindbeck? Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 61(4), 655-677.
9.New York Times. Magazine 9 nov 1988, 23.
10-Sanks, T. H. (1993). David Tracy's theological project: An overview and some implications. Theological Studies, 54(4), 698-727.
11-Tracy, David. (1981). Defending the Public Character of Theology. appeared in the Christian Century, April 1, 1981, pp. 350-356.
12-Tracy, D. (1981). The analogical imagination: Christian theology and the culture of pluralism. The Crosseroad Publishing Compant.New York.
13-Tracy, D. (1996). Blessed rage for order: The new pluralism in theology. University of Chicago Press.
14-Tracy, D. (1985). Lindbeck's new program for theology: A reflection. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 49(3), 460-472.
15-Wainwright, G. (Ed.). (1988). Keeping the Faith: Essays to Mark the Centenary of Lux Mundi. Fortress Press.
Metaphysical Research